† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51701099, 51801044, and 51671071), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. LH2019E091), and Fundamental Research Funds in Heilongjiang Provincial Universities, China (Grant No. 135409320). Thanks to the help of Technology Innovation Center of Agricultural Multi-Dimensional Sensor Information Perception, Heilongjiang Province.
Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 ferromagnetic shape memory alloy microwires with diameters of ∼ 30–50 μm and grain sizes of ∼ 2–5 μm were prepared by melt-extraction technique. A step-wise chemical ordering annealing was carried out to improve the superelasticity strain and recovery ratio which were hampered by the internal stress, compositional inhomogeneity, and high-density defects in the as-extracted Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwires. The annealed microwires exhibited enhanced atomic ordering degree, narrow thermal hysteresis, and high saturation magnetization under a low magnetic field. As a result, the annealed microwire showed decreased superelastic critical stress, improved reversibility, and a high superelastic strain (1.9%) with a large recovery ratio (> 96%). This kind of filamentous material with superior superelastic effects may be promising materials for minor-devices.
Shape memory alloys (SMAs), such as Ni–Mn–Ga,[1] Ni–Ti,[2] Cu–Al–Ni,[3] and Fe–Pd[4] alloys, have attracted increasing attention in the past decade as promising candidate materials applicable in hydraulic, pneumatic, and motor-based systems. Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys (FMSMAs)[5] combine the martensite transformation and magnetic transitions and exhibit multi-functional properties, such as shape memory effect (SME),[1,6,7] superelasticity (SE),[8,9] magnetic-field-induced strain (MFIS),[10] and magnetocaloric effect (MCE)[11,12] driven by external thermal or magnetic fields. These excellent properties make FMSMAs potential candidate materials applying in sensors, actuators, and magnetic refrigerants (MR). SE in FMSMAs is also related to the stress-induced martensite (SIM) transformation when loading and reverse transformation upon unloading.[8] By taking advantages of the superelasticity, FMSMAs may be used for many products, e.g., cellular phone antennae, spectacle frames, medical guidewires and stents.[13]
Ni–Mn–Ga alloys have been widely studied in the past two decades. In order to improve the brittleness of Ni-Mn-Ga alloys, a fourth-element doping[14–20] and materials with fine grains[7,12,20–25] are the favorable methods. Recently, we reported the enhanced plastic deformation capability of Fe-doped Ni49.7Mn25.0Ga19.8Fe5.5 microwires due to the fine grains resulting from the melt-extraction process.[7,12,23,24] Further studies revealed the effect of the Fe content on the martensite transformation and superelasticity behaviors in the as-extracted Ni50Mn25Ga25 − xFex microwires.[24] Although the as-extracted microwires exhibited a superelastic strain > 0.75%, the recovery ratio was low due to the high defect density and internal stress induced by rapid quenching during melt-extraction. In addition, various magnetic coupled states were created in Ni–Mn–Ga microwires by varying the Fe-doping contents.[25] The magnitude of the direct magnetocaloric effect (DMCE) and inverse magnetocaloric effect (IMCE) could be feasibly adjusted by changing the Fe-doping contents.[25] This kind of filamentous material with both shape memory effect, superelasticity, and magnetocaloric properties has more broad application prospects.
As previously reported, an enhancement of magnetization and a reduction of MT hysteresis were observed in Ni–Mn–Ga microwires after annealing at 800 °C. The improved MT and magnetic characteristics are related to the improvement of the antiferromagnetic Mn–Mn exchange interactions associated with reduction in the density of defects (such as vacancies, atomic disorders, and antiphase boundaries).[26] Our previous results also showed that, in Ni50.6Mn28Ga21.4 alloy microwires, the defects and internal-stress could be reduced by annealing, which increased the elastic strain storage energy and reduced the energy dissipation.[27] As a result, the superelastic performance may be enhanced. Here, the as-extracted Ni49.7Mn25Ga19.8Fe5.5 microwires were subjected to a step-wise chemical ordering annealing heat treatment. The microstructure, martensite transformation, magnetic property, and superelasticity were investigated systematically. The results showed that the annealed microwires exhibited enhanced atomic ordering degree, narrow thermal hysteresis, and high saturation magnetization under a low magnetic field, which contributed to the high superelastic strain and large recovery ratio.
Ni–Mn–Ga–Fe ingots were prepared by arc melting using pure elemental materials Ni (99.99%), Mn (99.99%), Ga (99.99%), and Fe (99.99%) in a high-purity argon atmosphere, followed by vacuum casting in a copper mold. The microwires with a nominal composition of Ni49.7Mn25Ga19.8Fe5.5 (atomic percent) were prepared by a melt-extraction technique using a copper wheel. Details of the fabrication process can be found in Ref. [24]. The as-extracted microwires were then subjected to a step-wise annealing heat-treatment allowing for chemical ordering. The annealing process was carried out at 993 K for 2 h, 953 K for 10 h, and 723 K for 20 h respectively, followed by furnace-cooling to room-temperature.
The grain morphology of the microwires was observed in a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM-Helios Nanolab600i). The martensite twin structure was investigated using thin-foil specimens in a transmission electron microscope (Tecnai G2 F30 TEM). The crystal structure of the as-extracted and annealed microwires was determined using a Philips X′Pert Pro instrument with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). The martensite and magnetic transition temperatures of the microwires were examined on a commercial magnetic property measurement system (MPMS) from Quantum Design. The measurement was carried out under a magnetic field of 10 Oe, by heating the microwires from 250 K to 400 K at 5 K/min, maintaining at 400 K for 5 min, and finally cooling to 250 K at 5 K/min. In order to remove the demagnetization effect, the microwires with aspect ratio > 30 were oriented parallel to the applied magnetic field. The superelastic test temperatures of a single microwire were determined from the internal friction (tan δ) versus temperature (T) curves on a dynamic mechanical analyzer (Q800 DMA), with oscillation frequency 1 Hz, strain amplitude 5 × 10−4, and heating/cooling rates 5 K/min. The optimized superelastic test temperatures were determined to be ∼ 310 K and ∼ 318 K (higher than Ms) for the as-extracted and annealed microwires, respectively. The loading and unloading rates were 0.04 N/min during the superelastic tests.
During the melt-extraction process, the melt filaments are subjected to an extremely high solidification rate, leading to the formation of fine grains (grain size of ∼ 1 μm, as illustrated in Fig.
![]() | Fig. 1. SEM micrographs of the grains and fracture surfaces of the Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwires: (a), (b) the as-extracted microwires, and (c), (d) the annealed microwires. |
Figure
The martensite twin structures in the extracted and annealed microwires are further investigated by TEM as displayed in Fig.
The temperature dependence of magnetization (M–T) curves of the microwires are shown in Fig.
![]() | Table 1. Phase transition data of the as-extracted and annealed Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwires obtained from M–T and M–H curves. . |
Figure
To determine the superelastic test temperature of a microwire, tanδ–T curves are measured for an annealed microwire as shown in Fig.
![]() | Fig. 5. Temperature dependent internal friction (tanδ–T) and storage modulus of annealed Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwire. |
The superelastic tests of the as-extracted and annealed microwires are conducted at temperatures higher than their Ms. The tensile stress–strain curves under different loadings for the as-extracted and annealed microwires at temperatures 310 K and 318 K are displayed in Figs.
![]() | Fig. 6. Tensile stress–strain curves under different loadings for (a) as-extracted Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwires at temperature of 310 K and (b) annealed ones at temperature of 318 K. |
![]() | Table 2. Experimental data of the as-extracted and annealed Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwires obtained from tensile stress–strain curves. . |
The reversibility of superelasticity is also important for the practical application of SMAs. Figure
The effects of step-wise chemical ordering annealing on the microstructure, martensite transformation, and superelasticity in polycrystalline Ni50Mn25Ga20Fe5 microwires were investigated. The annealed microwires exhibited narrow thermal hysteresis, lower saturated magnetization field, higher superelastic strain, higher recovery ratio, higher magnetization, and a near room temperature MT compared with the as-cast wires. Given these properties, these microwires can be used as candidate materials in various micro-devices and micro-sensor. The main conclusions can be drawn as follows.
(1) After chemical ordering annealing, with the increase in the atomic ordering as well as the decrease in the internal stress and defect density, the microwires showed seven-layered modulated structure and straight martensite variant twin boundaries, with each variant forming an adaptive configuration and showing good consistency.
(2) Chemical ordering annealing promoted the transition temperature by ∼ 20 K and decreased the thermal hysteresis by ∼ 6 K for the microwire, this may be attributed to the reduction in the defect density and internal stress. The annealed microwires exhibited a saturation magnetization of ∼ 60 emu/g under a low magnetic field of ∼ 15 kOe, the increase of the saturation field can be attributed to Mn atoms ordering in the lattice.
(3) The superelasticity may also be tailored by the chemical ordering annealing: the SIA stress was reduced and the reversibility during superelastic cycles was improved. The annealed microwire showed SE strain of ∼ 1.9% and a higher recovery ratio of strain > 96%.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] |